Greater Oklahoma City is in the geographic center of North America equidistant from the east and west coasts and major trade partners of Canada and Mexico. The ten county region is at the crossroads of the U.S., sitting at the heart of three major national highways on the NAFTA corridor.
There's a reason Greater Oklahoma City is such a great place for business: Location. The ten county region is positioned within a day's drive of the rapidly-growing south-central region (OK, TX, AR, LA) projected to grow more than 44% during the next 25 years.
Move over Dallas and Seattle. According to a new Portfolio.com / Bizjournals study, OKC ranks in the top 10 "Best Places for Young Adults" due to strong growth rates, low cost of living and high numbers of employed, college-educated under-34s. (We think Bricktown, Downtown, the Thunder, Western Avenue, the Plaza District, Midtown, Paseo and so forth don't hurt either . . . But that's just our opinion.)
(March 15, 2010)
Last week, some of Oklahoma City's most recognized architects pitched their best visions for a new "central park" that city leaders hope will anchor the area known as "Core to Shore."
They didn't have much time to prepare. A request for proposals to qualify for the project was distributed just a few weeks ago. And there isn't any real funding for the park to be built, especially if it's to match up to Mayor Mick Cornett's dream of having our own version of Chicago's Millennium Park.
For those not familiar with Chicago's park, it's a stunning 24-acre public space that includes a huge amphitheater, gardens, public art, fountains and a restaurant.
Oklahoma City, armed with bond funds and tax increment financing, has spent just under $6 million buying up properties for such a park - which would be centered on the site of the former U.S. Postal Service distribution center.
If it seems like the selection of an architect for a Core to Shore park is on the fast track, consider this: before the city can go to voters to fund such a project, it must first have a pretty water color sketch to present and a cost estimate.
Add into this equation the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber's report on needed funding for a new convention center ($250 million to $450 million) and an ongoing wish list for river improvements and a clear picture emerges - MAPS 3: Core to Shore.
Cornett insists that some form of public transit, the one wish-list item mentioned most by residents when they were surveyed about a potential MAPS 3 two years ago, will also be a part of any ballot.
And don't be too surprised if city leaders take a chance at rolling out such a vote later this year, even with the ongoing economic recession.
Will the plan sell?
What remains to be seen is whether city leaders can sell their vision to a public that, to date, hasn't shown as much excitement or interest in Core to Shore. And even more uncertain is the timing of all this if such a ballot is passed.
Before Core to Shore can really take off, the new alignment of the Interstate 40 Crosstown Expressway must be finished and the state must also find the funding necessary to build an ambitious boulevard planned to take its place.
Mayor Cornett believes the boulevard will be built, but it has yet to even make the state's eight-year construction plan and in recent weeks Oklahoma Department of Transportation Secretary Gary Ridley has been quoted using the word "if" when discussing when it might get built.
City leaders predict Core to Shore success will translate into new retail, housing and offices for the urban core. What's at stake is a redefinition of downtown, the Oklahoma River, and the impression the city makes on thousands of travelers who make their way through this currently blighted area daily.